This is a summary of an article entitled
“A Comparison between Deductive and Inductive Approaches for Teaching EFL
Grammar to High School Students” authored by Correa, Torres, Cueva, and
Saritama; published in International Journal of Instruction on January 2019.
The
concern of whether to teach grammar deductively or inductively has been one of
the most debatable and unrequited questions. This relates to the important role
in which teaching grammar plays in EFL class, therefore, finding an appropriate
teaching method is might as well be vital. Deductive teaching is an old-fashioned
method in which giving information about the target language and rules comes at
the beginning of a class then followed by the examples. Students then produce
their own example following the presented rules as guidance. In contrast, in
inductive teaching, learners would need to analyze examples in a context (e.g.
text or audios) in order to determine the grammar rules by themselves. Only
after noticing the rules by themselves can the students create their own
examples; hence practicing the language. Regardless of which approach is used,
it is might as well be essential to point out the relationship built between
students and teachers. Since motivation is important in the teaching-learning
process, the establishment of decent communication between teachers and
students in achieving a successful and positive teaching and learning process
is significant. The term of this pleasant and respectful relationship of
communication is rapport. A decent rapport between students and teachers would
be an advantageous aid for teachers in the teaching process. The authors try
both approaches to teaching grammar with the aim of determining which one is
more effective in the EFL classroom. In this regard, regardless of the fact
that Ecuadorian educators and authorities are alert of the significance of
learning English and have adopted several measures to improve this process,
students in Ecuador do not obtain the desired EFL proficiency level. Thus, this
study focuses on discovering the difference in effectiveness between the
inductive and deductive approaches to teaching grammar in the EFL classroom. In
addition, the effectiveness of rapport during English lessons is also evaluated.
There are two guiding questions the authors use to lead the finding: 1) which
of the two approaches is more effective for teaching EFL grammar? 2) How
effective is rapport when teaching EFL grammar deductively and inductively? This
study is conducted in a public school in Ecuador where students commonly attend
5 EFL classes per week (45 minutes each class). Two classes of the second year
of senior high school consisting of seventy students in total are randomly
selected out of seven existing classes as the participant. Their ages range
from 15 to 17 years old, and their English proficiency level diverse between A1
and A2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). An observation
sheet, a pre-test, and post-test are the instruments the authors choose to use.
The result of the research indicates that there are improvements in both
classes applying each of the approaches, the class which applies deductive
approach results in a significant improvement in the scores between the grammar
pre-test and post-test (t = 8.2395; p<0.0001). A similar thing happens with
the class applying the inductive approach where there is also an improvement in
the scores between the grammar pre-test and post-test (t = 10.0901; p <
0.0001). By applying the qualitative scale established for the test, the
authors are able to point out that there the improvement of deductive group
goes from “fair” to “good”, whereas the inductive group goes from “fair” to
“very good”. Regarding the rapport, the observation sheet points out that in
the deductive group, the rapport is effective; in most classes (10 out of 15
classes) students are attracted to the class and the teacher also is respectful
(13 out of 15 classes). Regarding feedback, it is provided in more than half of
the classes (9 classes). In all of the classes, students feel encouraged to
contribute, there is an enthusiasm shown in the interaction (10 classes).
Students also feel confident to ask for more clarification (12 classes). Rapport is also
effective in the classes applying the inductive approach. In most of the
classes, the results indicate that students are interested (12 out of 15
classes), the teacher is also respectful (14 classes) and the feedback is
provided (13 classes). Furthermore, almost all classes, students are eager to contribute
(14 classes), cooperate with the teacher (12 classes), show enthusiasm (12
classes), and are confident when asking for explanations (13 classes). In
short, even though both approaches to teaching grammar have been effective in
terms of rapport, the inductive group is a little higher in the percentages of
efficiency in rapport. In conclusion, both groups have a similar level of
grammar knowledge before the intervention, which improves after it; still, the
inductive approach has a slight advantage in terms of improving students’
grammar knowledge according to the statistical analysis. There is an effective
rapport in the EFL classes in both groups. Yet, the rapport observed in the
inductive approach group is somewhat more effective, considering aspects such
as the teacher being respectful, feedback being provided, students
participating in class and interacting with teachers, enthusiasm, and
confidence when asking for explanations in class. In spite of the fact that the
present study favors the inductive approach as a more effective method to
teaching EFL grammar, the fact that this is a study conducted in one high
school and possibly will not be generalizable to other contexts has to be
considered.
Original Article:
Benitez-Correa,
C., Gonzalez-Torres, P., Ochoa-Cueva, C., & Vargas-Saritama, A.
(2019). A Comparison between Deductive and Inductive Approaches for
Teaching EFL Grammar to High School Students. International Journal of
Instruction, 12(1), 225-236.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12115a
0 Comments